BasilDV
This really is a simple and straight forward question that does not need to be over complicated.
The issue is in no way related to the identity of the individual who owns the email account.
I have already given you the particular email address which demonstrates, and is the basis of my concern.
The reality is surely whether an informative warning message such as an Error 550 warning message is required to be sent back from a non existent or closed email address, or it is simply not required to be provided.
And if not required, is it simply up to the discretion of TPG as the service provider to consider or ignore the genuine interests of its email customers in making the decision to provide such a warning or not ?
If you say that it is not a requirement, and also then say that TPG chooses not to provide that warning message which would have been to the benefit of their customers then of course that is TPG's right.
I however would find that situation to be obnoxious, and It would also be my right to inform TPG customers what they can expect to happen to those email customers when they choose for whatever reason to cancel, or are forced to cancel an email service controlled by TPG.
Where this personally impacts me, is that my own Picknowl email address is about to be forcibly closed down by TPG in the very near future. I believe that TPG are likely to treat all their customers in a similar manner. I am therefore concerned that my own email address @picknowl.com.au is likely to suffer the same fate.
I have given up fighting the imminent forced closure by TPG of my emaill address that I have had for decades.
But this means my own reputation potentially suffering because of senders to my soon to be closed email, appearing to be ignored, not through my own actions, but as a result of TPG not advising the sender that their messages will not be delivered to the intended recipient.
